Введение. Предметом рассмотрения является эпистемология образования. Цель работы состоит в её систематизации и представлении актуальной структуры. Применяются системный подход и общенаучные методы – анализ, синтез, абстрагирование и обобщение исследуемого материала.
Содержание. Проведен анализ и охарактеризовано текущее состояние исследований, проводимых на стыке современной эпистемологии и философии образования. В развитии научного дискурса эпистемологии образования было выделено три ключевых исследовательских направления: первое занимается эпистемологическим анализом понятия «образования», второе – осмыслением познавательных целей образования, третье – исследованием соотношений практики образования с процессами познания. В рамках второго направления рассмотрены цели образования, ориентированные на: а) обретение эпистемических благ; б) формирование навыков; в) развитие познавательного характера личности. В рамках третьего направления затронуты вопросы о роли преподавательского убеждения, ученического доверия и значимости «знаний-что» и «знаний-как» в контексте образовательных программ. Выявлены эпистемологические основания понятий «обучение» и «преподавание», почеркнута значимость эпистемического убеждения, авторитета и ответственности учителя по отношению к учащимся, затронуты проблемы соотношения «знаний-что» и «знаний-как» на макро- и микроуровне, а также рассматриваемые в рамках третьего направления вопросы индоктринации, мультикультурализма и места необщепризнанных точек зрения в содержании учебных программ.
Выводы. В статье предложена модель актуальной структуры эпистемологии образования и рассмотрена возможность введения её в отечественный философский дискурс. Отмечено, что анализ познавательных аспектов образования имеет ключевое значение, так как его результаты определяют место образования в познании вместе с механизмами его получения. Установлено, что познавательные цели образования находят обоснование в эпистемологии образования, что плодотворно сказывается на понимании сущности педагогического процесса и его эффективности в достижении избранных целей.
Introduction. The subject of the article is the problem area of epistemology of education. The aim of the paper is to systematize it and present its actual structure. The purpose of the research was achieved within the framework of the system approach by means of general logical methods of research – analysis, synthesis, abstraction and generalization of literary sources.
Сontent. The article analyzes and characterizes the current state of research conducted at the intersection of modern epistemology and philosophy of education. In the development of scientific discourse of epistemology of education, three key research directions have been identified: the first one deals with the epistemological analysis of the concept of “education”, the second one – with the comprehension of epistemic aims of education, the third one – with the study of correlations between the practice of education and processes of cognition. The second direction considers approaches to the definition of educational goals focused on: a) acquisition of epistemic goods; b) formation of skills; c) development of intellectual character. Within the framework of the third direction the questions about the role of teachers' testimony, students' trust and the significance of “knowledge-that” and “knowledge-how” in the context of educational programs are mentioned. The author considers the epistemological bases of the concepts of “learning” and “teaching”, emphasizes the significance of epistemic belief, authority and responsibility of the teacher in relation to students, touches upon the problems of the correlation of “knowledge-that” and “knowledge-how” at the macro- and micro-levels, as well as the issues of indoctrination, multiculturalism and the place of marginalized points of view in the curriculum content considered within the framework of the third direction.
Conclusions. The scientific novelty of the article consists in the presentation of the actual structure of the problem area of epistemology of education and, as a consequence, its introduction into the domestic philosophical discourse. It is noted that the analysis of epistemological aspects of education is of key importance, as its results determine the place of education in cognition together with the mechanisms of its acquisition. It is established that the epistemic aims of education in its justification find a strong support in the epistemology of education, which has a positive impact on our understanding of the essence of the educational process and its efficiency in achieving the chosen aims.
Гершунин Сергей Аркадьевич-
Национальный исследовательский университет «МИЭТ»
Зеленоград, Москва, Российская Федерация
finbaricus@yandex.ru
1. Гершунин С. А. Цели образования на стыке эпистемологии и философии образования // Сборник статей международной конференции «Университет. Образование. Общество (к 300?летию Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета)». – СПб.: Сборка (Санкт-Петербург), 2023. – С. 36–41.
2. Adler J. E. Knowledge, Truth, and Learning // A Companion to the Philosophy of Education / edited by R. Curren. – Wiley, 2003. – P. 285–304. DOI: 10.1002/9780470996454.ch21.
3. Bevan R. Expanding rationality: the relation between epistemic virtue and critical thinking // Educational Theory. – 2009. – Vol. 59, No. 2. – P. 167–179. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00312.x
4. Carter J. A., Kotzee B. Epistemology of Education // Oxford Bibliographies Online in Philosophy. – 2015. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0292
5. Education and the Growth of Knowledge: Perspectives from Social and Virtue Epistemology / Ed. B. Kotzee. – Wiley, 2013. – 185 p. DOI: 10.1002/9781118721254
6. Elgin C. Understanding and the facts // Philosophical Studies. – 2007. – Vol. 132. – P. 33–42. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-006-9054-z
7. Goldman A. I. Knowledge in a Social World. – Oxford University Press, 1999. – 407 p.
8. Kvanvig J. L. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. – Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 216 p.
9. Moore A. W. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy // Central Works of Philosophy Volume 5: Twentieth Century: Quine and After / Ed. J. Shand. – New York: Routledge, 2014. – P. 207–227.
10. Ocampo Gonz?lez A. Epistemology of inclusive education // Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales. – 2021. – Vol. 12, No. 2. – P. 453–467. DOI: 10.21501/22161201.4066
11. Pritchard D. Epistemic Virtue and the Epistemology of Education // Education and the Growth of Knowledge / Ed. B. Kotzee. – Wiley, 2013. – P. 92–105. DOI: 10.1002/9781118721254.ch5
12. Pritchard D. Neuromedia and the Epistemology of Education // Connecting Virtues / Eds. M. Croce, M. S. Vaccarezza. – Wiley, 2018. – P. 129–149. DOI: 10.1002/9781119525660.ch7
13. Robertson E. The Epistemic Aims of Education // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy |87| of Education / edited by H. Siegel. – Oxford University Press, 2010. – P. 11–34. DOI: 10.1093oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0002
14. Siegel H. Epistemology and Education: An Incomplete Guide to the Social-Epistemological Issues // Episteme. – 2004. – Vol. 1, No 2. – P. 129–137. DOI: 10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.129
15. Siegel H. Epistemology of education // Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. – 2016. – DOI: 10.4324/0123456789-P074-1
16. Siegel H., Phillips D. C., Callan E. Philosophy of Education // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. – 2018. – URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2018/entries/education-philosophy/
17. Simion M. Social Epistemology of Education // Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory / edited by M. A. Peters. – Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. – P. 1–6. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_696-1
18. Watson L. The Epistemology of Education // Philosophy Compass. – 2016. – Vol. 11, No. 3. – P. 146–159. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12316
19. What is an Educational Process? // The Concept of Education / Ed. R. S. Peters. – London: Routledge, 1967. – Vol. 17. – P. 1–16. DOI: 10.4324/9780203861073
20. Zagzebski L. T. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. – Oxford University Press, 2012. – 304 p.
1. Gershunin, S. A. (2023) Celi obrazovaniya na styke epistemologii i filosofii obrazovaniya [The aims of education at the intersection of epistemology and philosophy of education]. Sbornik statej mezhdunarodnoj konferencii «Universitet. Obrazovanie. Obshchestvo (k 300?letiyu Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta)» [Proceedings of the International Conference «University. Education. Society. (on the 300th Anniversary of the St. Petersburg University)»]. Saint Petersburg: Sborka. Pp. 36–41. (In Russian).
2. Adler, J. E. (2003) Knowledge, Truth, and Learning. In R. Curren (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Education (1st ed.). Wiley. Pp. 285–304. DOI: 10.1002/9780470996454.ch21
3. Bevan, R. (2009) Expanding rationality: The relation between epistemic virtue and critical thinking. Educational Theory. No. 59 (2). Pp. 167–179. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00312.x
4. Carter, J. A., & Kotzee, B. (2015) Epistemology of Education. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0292
5. Kotzee, B. (2013) (ed.) Education and the Growth of Knowledge: Perspectives from Social and Virtue Epistemology (1st ed.). Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118721254
6. Elgin, C. (2007) Understanding and the facts. Philosophical Studies. No. 132 (1). Pp. 33–42. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-006-9054-z
7. Goldman, A. I. (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
8. Kvanvig, J. L. (2003) The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
9. Moore, A. W. (2014) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. In J. Shand (Ed.), Central Works of Philosophy Volume 5: Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Pp. 207–227. New York: Routledge.
10. Ocampo Gonz?lez, A. (2021) Epistemology of inclusive education. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales. No, 12 (2), Pp. 453–467. DOI: 10.21501/22161201.4066
11. Pritchard, D. (2013) Epistemic Virtue and the Epistemology of Education. В B. Kotzee (ed.). Education and the Growth of Knowledge (1st ed.). Pp. 92–105. Wiley. DOI:10.1002/9781118721254.ch5
12. Pritchard, D. (2018) Neuromedia and the Epistemology of Education. В M. Croce & M. S. Vaccarezza (Ed.). Connecting Virtues (1st ed.). Pp. 129–149. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781119525660.ch7
13. Robertson, E. (2010) The Epistemic Aims of Education. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education (1st ed.). Pp. 11–34. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0002
14. Siegel, H. (2004) Epistemology and Education: An Incomplete Guide to the Social-Epistemological Issues. Episteme. No. 1 (2). Pp. 129–137. DOI: 10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.129
15. Siegel, H. (2016) Epistemology of education. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/0123456789-P074-1
16. Siegel, H., Phillips, D. C., & Callan, E. (2018) Philosophy of Education. В E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/education-philosophy/
17. Simion, M. (2020) Social Epistemology of Education. В M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Pp. 1–6. Singapore: Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_696-1
18. Watson, L. (2016) The Epistemology of Education. Philosophy Compass. Pp. 11 (3). Pp. 146–159. DOI:10.1111/phc3.12316
19. Peters, R. S. (1967) (ed.) What is an Educational Process? In The Concept of Education. Vol. 17. Pp. 1–16. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203861073
20. Zagzebski, L. T. (2012) Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford University Press.