Трансгуманизм и постгуманизм в контексте религиоведения

Transhumanism and Posthumanism in the Religious Studies Context

Авторы:
Тульпе Ирина Александровна,

DOI:
10.35231/18186653_2024_1_200

Полный текст385,91 КБ

Введение. Объектом исследования является проблематика трансгуманизма (ТГ) и постгуманизма (ПГ) в тематическом пространстве религиоведения. Предмет исследования – отношение религии/религий к идеям и сценариям будущего, предлагаемым ТГ и ПГ. Трансгуманизм и постгуманизм прокладывают два пути к будущему: радикальное продление жизни в теле или бестелесное кибернетическое бессмертие. И то, и другое – попытки создать будущее без смерти.

Содержание. В статье рассматриваются религиозные оценки транс- и постгуманизма, а также включенность разных религий в трансгуманистическую проблематику совершенствования/улучшения человека. Наиболее существенный аспект проблемы заключается в сопоставлении предельных целей религий и способов их достижения с тем, что предлагается ТГ и ПГ. Обсуждается проблема предполагаемого бессмертия, при том экзистенциальном значении, которое имело для человека знание о неизбежности смерти: только человек способен не просто знать о своей конечности, но и руководствоваться этим знанием, определяя смысл/смыслы своего существования.

Выводы. Ключевое расхождение между религиями и транс- постгуманистическими проектами заключается в различном понимании целей – обеспеченное технологиями бесконечное долголетие vs посмертного блаженства, целиком или частично (с божьей помощью) достигаемого личными усилиями верующего.

Теоретически можно предположить, что насколько религии способны адаптироваться к меняющимся условиям, настолько они «по умолчанию» примут изменения или будут изменять базовые вероучительные формулировки, интерпретируя их содержательную часть сообразно наличной действительности.


Introduction. The object of the research is the problems of transhumanism (TG) and posthumanism (PG) in the thematic space of religious studies. The subject of the study is the relationship of religion/religions to the ideas and scenarios of the future proposed by TG and PG. Transhumanism and posthumanism pave two paths to the future: radical prolongation of life in the body or disembodied cybernetic immortality. Both are attempts to create a future without death.

Content. The article examines religious assessments of trans- and posthumanism, as well as the inclusion of different religions in the transhumanistic problems of human perfection/betterment. The most significant aspect of the problem is to compare the ultimate goals of religions and the ways to achieve them with what is proposed by TG and PG. The problem of supposed immortality is discussed, with the existential significance that knowledge of the inevitability of death had for a person: only a person is able not only to know about his finiteness, but also to be guided by this knowledge, determining the meaning/meanings of his existence.

Conclusion. The key difference between religions and trans- posthumanist projects lies in the different understanding of goals – technology-provided endless longevity vs posthumous bliss, achieved in whole or in part (with God's help) by the personal efforts of the believer.

Theoretically, it can be assumed that to the extent that religions are able to adapt to changing conditions, they will either accept changes by default or will change the basic doctrinal formulations, interpreting their substantial part in accordance with the present reality.

Тульпе Ирина Александровна
кандидат философских наук, доцент
Ленинградский государственный университет им. А. С. Пушкина
Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация
tulpei@rambler.ru

1. Ковба Д. М., Грибовод Е. Г. Теоретические аспекты феномена трансгуманизма: основные направления // Дискурс-Пи: научный журнал. – 2019. – № 3 (36). – С. 38–52.
2. Сазеева И. Б., Грошева Т. Н. Антигуманистический характер философии трансгуманизма // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. – Тамбов: Грамота. – 2017. – № 3 (77): в 2-х ч. Ч. 1. – C. 122–126.
3. Четверикова О. Н. Диктатура просвещенных. Дух и цели трансгуманизма. – М.: Благословение, 2015. – 160 с.
4. Beverley F. McGuire. Buddhist Uploads // Posthumanism: The Future of Homo Sapiens / Michael Bess and Diana Walsh Pasulka (eds). – Cengage Gale. 2018. – P. 143–153.
5. Braidotti R. Posthuman Knowledge. – Medford (MA): Polity Press, 2019. – 210 p.
6. Caccamo J. F. The Catholic Tradition and Posthumanism: A Matter of How to Be Human // Posthumanism: the Future of Homo Sapiens: the unknown future of human enhancement / Michael Bess and Diana Walsh Pasulka (eds). – Praeger ABC–Clio, LLC, 2015. – Р. 201–212.
7. Chapple Chr. K. Hinduism: Many Paths, Many Births // Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). – New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. – P. 51–66.
8. Chapple Chr. K. Jainism: The Good Life and the Transcendence of Death // Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). – New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. – P. 85–100.
9. Cira C. E. The Christian Orthodox Faith and Christian Transhumanism // SUBBTO 65. – 2020. – No. 1. – P. 71–80.
10. Clay E. Transhumanism and the Orthodox Christian Tradition // Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism / Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L Mossman (eds). – Peter Lang. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. 2011. – P. 157–180.
11. Cole-Turner R. Extreme Longevity Research: A Progressive Protestant Perspective // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – P. 51–61.
12. Dorff Elliot N. Becoming Yet More Like God: A Jewish Perspective on Radical Life Extension // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer. (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. –P. 63–74.
13. Fohr Sherry E. Karma, Austerity, and Time Cycles: Jainism and Radical Life Extension // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer. (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – P. 75–84.
14. Gallaher B. Technological Theosis? An Eastern Orthodox Critique of Religious Transhumanism // Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics / Gouw Arvin M., Green Brian Patrick, Peters Ted (eds). – Lexington Books, 2022. P. 161–181.
15. Herbrechter S. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. – Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. – 247 р.
16. Heup Young Kim. Perfecting Humanity in Confucianism and Transhumanism. What Heaven imparts to human is called human nature // Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics /Gouw Arvin M., Green Brian Patrick, Peters Ted (eds). – Lexington Books, 2022. – P. 101–112.
17. Huxley J. New Bottles for New Wine. – London: Chatto & Windus. 1957. – 318 p.
18. Keith J. R. Buddhist Biohackers: The New Enlightenment // Posthumanism: The Future of Homo Sapiens / Michael Bess and Diana Walsh Pasulka (eds). Cengage Gale, 2018. – P. 213–225.
19. Lidke J. S., Dirnberger J. W. Churning the Ocean of Milk: Hindu Tantrism and Radical Life Technologies // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – P. 97–110.
20. Maher D. F. Two Wings of a Bird: Radical Life Extension from a Buddhist Perspective // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer. (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – P. 111–122.
21. Mahootian F. Ideals of Human Perfection: A Comparison of Sufism and Transhumanism // Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism / Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L Mossman. (eds). – Peter Lang; Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2011. – P. 133–156.
22. Mavani H. Islam – God’s Deputy: Islam and Transhumanism // Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). – New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014. – P. 67–84.
23. Mercer C. Protestant Christianity – Sorting Out Soma in the Debate About Transhumanism: One Protestant’s Perspective // Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). – New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. – P. 137–154.
24. Nichols T. L. Radical Life Extension: Implications for Roman Catholicism // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan. 2009. – P. 133–144.
25. Samuelson N. and Tirosh-Samuelson H. Jewish Perspectives on Transhumanism // Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism / Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L Mossman (eds). –Peter Lang; Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2011. – P. 105–132.
26. Sharma A. “May You Live Long”: Religious Implications of Extreme Longevity in Hinduism // Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). – Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – P. 145–154.


1. Kovba, D. M., Gribovod, E. G. (2019) Teoreticheskie aspekty fenomena transgumanizma: osnovnye napravleniya [Theoretical aspects of the transhumanism phenomenon: main directions]. Nauchnyj zhurnal “Diskurs-Pi” – Scientific journal “Discourse-Pi”. No. 3 (36). Pp. 38–52. (In Russian).
2. Sazeeva, I. B., Grosheva, T. N. (2017) Antigumanisticheskij kharakter filosofii transgumanizma [Anti-humanistic character of the transhumanism philosophy]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov: Gramota. No. 3 (77): Part. 1. Pp. 122–126. (In Russian).
3. Chetverikova, O. N. (2015) Diktatura prosveshchennykh. Dukh i tseli transgumanizma [Dictatorship of the Enlightened. The spirit and goals of transhumanism]. Moskva: Blagoslovenie. (In Russian).
4. Beverley, F. McGuire. (2018) Buddhist Uploads. Posthumanism: The Future of Homo Sapiens / Michael Bess and Diana Walsh Pasulka (eds). Cengage Gale, Pp. 143–153.
5. Braidotti, Rosi. (2019) Posthuman Knowledge. Medford (MA): Polity Press.
6. Caccamo, James F. (2015) The Catholic Tradition and Posthumanism: A Matter of How to Be Human. Posthumanism: The Future of Homo Sapiens: the unknown future of human enhancement / Michael Bess and Diana Walsh Pasulka (eds). Praeger ABC–Clio, LLC. Pp. 201–212.
7. Chapple, Christopher Key. (2014) Hinduism: Many Paths, Many Births. Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 51–66.
8. Chapple, Christopher Key. (2014) Jainism: The Good Life and the Transcendence of Death. Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher. (eds). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 85–100.
9. Cira, C?lin Emilian. (2020) The Christian Orthodox Faith and Christian Transhumanism. SUBBTO 65. No. 1. Pp. 71–80.
10. Clay, Eugene. (2011) Transhumanism and the Orthodox Christian Tradition. Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism / Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L Mossman (eds). Peter Lang. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. Pp. 157–180.
11. Cole-Turner, Ronald. (2009) Extreme Longevity Research: A Progressive Protestant Perspective. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 51–61.
12. Dorff, Elliot N. (2009) Becoming Yet More Like God: A Jewish Perspective on Radical Life Extension. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 63–74.
13. Fohr, Sherry E. (2009) Karma, Austerity, and Time Cycles: Jainism and Radical Life Extension. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer. (eds). Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 75–84.
14. Gallaher, Brandon. (2022) Technological Theosis? An Eastern Orthodox Critique of Religious Transhumanism. Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics / Gouw Arvin M., Green Brian Patrick, Peters Ted (eds). Lexington Books, Pp. 161–181.
15. Herbrechter, Stefan. (2013) Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. Bloomsbury Academic.
16. Heup Young Kim. (2022) Perfecting Humanity in Confucianism and Transhumanism. What Heaven imparts to human is called human nature. Religious Transhumanism and Its Critics / Gouw Arvin M., Green Brian Patrick, Peters Ted (eds). Lexington Books, Pp. 101–112.
17. Huxley, Julian. (1957) New Bottles for New Wine. London: Chatto & Windus.
18. Keith, Julian R. (2018) Buddhist Biohackers: The New Enlightenment. Posthumanism: The Future of Homo Sapiens / Michael Bess and Diana Walsh Pasulka (eds). Cengage Gale, Pp. 213–225.
19. Lidke, Jeffrey S., Dirnberger, Jacob W. (2009). Churning the Ocean of Milk: Hindu Tantrism and Radical Life Technologies. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 97–110.
20. Maher, Derek F. (2009) Two Wings of a Bird: Radical Life Extension from a Buddhist Perspective. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 111–122.
21. Mahootian, Farzad. (2011) Ideals of Human Perfection: A Comparison of Sufism and Transhumanism. Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism / Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L Mossman (eds). Peter Lang; Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, Pp. 133–156.
22. Mavani, Hamid. (2014) Islam – God’s Deputy: Islam and Transhumanism. Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Pp. 67–84.
23. Mercer, Calvin. (2014) Protestant Christianity – Sorting Out Soma in the Debate About Transhumanism: One Protestant’s Perspective. Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak / Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher (eds). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 137–154.
24. Nichols, Terence L. (2009) Radical Life Extension: Implications for Roman Catholicism. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 133–144.
25. Samuelson, Norbert and Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava. (2011). Jewish Perspectives on Transhumanism. Building Better Humans? Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism / Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L Mossman (eds). Peter Lang; Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. Pp. 105–132.
26. Sharma, Arvind. (2009) “May You Live Long”: Religious Implications of Extreme Longevity in Hinduism. Religion and the implications of radical life extension / Derek F. Maher, Calvin Mercer (eds). Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 145–154.

Ключевые слова:
трансгуманизм, постгуманизм, религии, телесность, человек, технологическое бессмертие, религиозное бессмертие, transhumanism, posthumanism, religions, corporeality, human being, technological immortality, religious immortality

Для цитирования:
Тульпе И. А. Трансгуманизм и постгуманизм в контексте религиоведения // Вестник Ленинградского государственного университета имени А. С. Пушкина. – 2024. – № 1. – С. 200–214. DOI: 10.35231/18186653_2024_1_200. EDN: OSZZAW Tul'pe, I. A. (2024) Transgumanizm i postgumanizm v kontekste religiovedeniya [Transhumanism and Posthumanism in the Religious Studies Context]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina – Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. No. 1. Pp. 200–214. (In Russian). DOI: 10.35231/18186653_2024_1_200. EDN: OSZZAW

Ленинградский государственный университет им. А.С. Пушкина